
Intelligent P&IDs for Hydrogen & Renewables — Built in Visio
A session for engineers authoring hydrogen and renewables P&IDs — ISA 5.1 and PIP compliant, inside Visio, at concept and front-end stage, with the equipment and valve lists generated straight from the drawing.
The problem
Hydrogen and renewables work is modular and repeat-heavy — electrolyzer, purification, drying, compression, balance-of-plant — and those packages get configured and reconfigured at concept and quote stage, often before a project is funded. A full plant-design suite is built for detailed engineering, usually sits with a separate CAD group, and is overkill for repeat skid work. Draw it dumb in Visio instead and you get a picture with no data behind it, plus equipment and valve lists you re-key by hand and reconcile every time a package changes. So, the most iterative, repeat-heavy stage of the work runs on the least-suited tools.
Meet VPID
It gives the front end of your workflow what it's been missing: real, standards-compliant P&IDs the process engineer can build directly — no separate CAD group, no drafting queue — and the lists that come straight off the drawing. It gives the front end of your workflow what it's been missing: real, standards-compliant P&IDs the process engineer can build directly — no separate.
Where VPID fits — and where it doesn't. VPID is a front-end P&ID authoring tool. It's not a 3D plant modeler, it doesn't do isometrics, and it isn't a replacement for detailed-design CAD. That's deliberate — it owns the stage where the heavy tools don't fit: concept, front-end, skid and balance-of-plant packages, and repeat configurations.
Who this is for
This session is for you if you’re:
- A process or application engineer authoring hydrogen or renewables P&IDs at concept and front-end stage
- An in-house engineer who owns the process but hands drawings to a separate CAD group
- A skid or module builder producing P&IDs for electrolyzer, purification, compression, and balance-of-plant packages
Typically small teams, one to three engineers who own the process and the drawing.
This probably isn't for you if you're:
- Doing detailed or construction-grade design on a full plant-design suite
- A large EPC standardized on traditional CAD P&ID tools
- Looking for 3D modeling, isometrics, stress analysis, or multi-discipline database integration
Speaker
Ryan Roach
AVP Sales
Anagh Vaidya
Application Engineer
What you'll see
The problem, a product demo, and live Q&A.
The demo walks through a generic process — the workflow and the reports are identical whatever you're drawing.

Deutsch
English